The third
week of January is the scheduled examination week for the third quarter grading period. So,
teachers are supposed to be making their tests now. We should now be writing
our table of specifications, making questions based on the table and having it
checked by the master teacher of the subject. But...hehehe...teachers' weekends are sacrosant.
There are some things that tests and examinations cannot measure. I teach music and paper tests for music cannot measure the pupils' musicality. |
Things to remember in making a test: Prepare test questions
based on the lessons taught or tackled within the grading period, organize the
test from easy to difficult, vary the test type from multiple choice, matching
type to essay; distractors should be related to the correct answers so that the
pupils would find it quite challenging to get the correct answer and not just
use simple common sense to figure out the correct answer, and make sure the
instructions are simple and easy to understand. Basically, these are the things
to remember in test construction
Validity
and reliability are things best left to the teachers of Measurement and
Evaluations.
Tests are
difficult to construct now because purely objective tests are discouraged.
Gone are the days of purely objective test.
Test
items like this are discouraged:
1. What
do you use to cut wires?
a. Wire
Cutter b.
Hammer c.
Screw Driver
Today’s
test items are situational.
Example:
1. Mang
Pedro and his family was watching TV when the electricity went out. He looked
for cause of the black out, and he found out that main switch’s fuses was
busted. He bought replacement fuse. What tool should Mang Pedro use to remove
and replace the fuse?
a. Pliers b.
Hammer c.
Screw Driver
Imagine
how difficult this is especially for subjects that use English for instruction.
(Lucky for me, all the subjects I teach use Filipino.) Just
making up of the situations takes a lot of time plus making sure that the items
are grammatically correct, etc., then the encoding. The result: a three
page-legal sized-front and back test instrument (or whatever these examinations
are called by educators).
I have
nothing against “situational” tests except foe the extra effort it entails for
the teachers. Anyway, the advantages for the pupils are many. Primary is that
it promotes reading comprehension. Logical thinking is enhanced. It promotes
skills in recognizing cause and effect, making predictions, processes, etc.
It’s just
that this kind of test is so difficult to construct especially for a lazy
teacher like me.
No comments:
Post a Comment